Postmodernism rejects any universalism and with that, necessarily, the idea of \u200b\u200ba human essence. From this perspective, then, the idea that in a society more or less ideal man to carry out its essence, is intended to be a consequence of a metaphysical approach and, as such, should be dismissed.
addition, it is impossible to define the conditions of happiness for man, because if nothing is universally valid, these conditions may also vary from one individual to another. We return, once again, relativism. With this in mind, however, it can be said that a slave can be exploited happy, even a prisoner, a person deprived of his liberty, a displaced person and so on. It is difficult, however, clearly support this hypothesis. And besides, if we admit that a slave exploited can be happy, there will be the question of as it may be, thus, they assume, against the principle of anti-universalist, the conditions under which even a slave, as man can be happy. It 's really difficult to do without a certain metaphysics.
postmodernist criticism, however, effectively bringing the question to reconsider more carefully the issue of possible human essence, some are hard to define ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment